Monday, August 10, 2020


Moab, UT

77.3 F

    Speak up: Designers seek input on land use future

    Featured Stories

    Survey: Local parents want daily in-person teaching

    “I really don’t think that 40% of all people are not going to send their kid to school.”

    Tales of Trails: Savor spectacular views from thrilling Shafer Trail

    In the 1890s, Moab pioneer brothers Frank M. And John S. Shafer developed the route from what had been a Native American pathway connecting what is now Canyonlands National Park to the river below.

    At 99, Moab man is knighted by France

    “The French people will never forget his courage and devotion to the great cause of freedom,”

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 4: ‘A year in the land of eternal spring’

    Though I planned to return someday, whether as a Peace Corps volunteer or not, this experience proved that even the best-laid plans go awry.

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 3: Sudden departure came with painful goodbyes

    Men donned wooden masks and numerous layers of sweatshirts and ponchos then proceeded to hit each other with whips as they danced around the town square.
    Doug McMurdo
    Doug McMurdo
    Editor Doug McMurdo reports on news out of the Moab City Center, tourism, courts, change of government and more.
    Pedestrians cross a busy Moab Moab Main Street on April 15. Community members are invited to share their concerns about potential zoning options in their increasingly busy town at an April 30 workshop. Photo by Doug McMurdo

    Representatives from Landmark Design, the firm under contract with Grand County and the City of Moab to create a unified land use plan, invite residents to attend a workshop to review potential ordinances and zoning options, local and national case studies and examples, and economic and market analyses for southeastern Utah.

    They also want to hear public input on preliminary land use concepts focused on overnight accommodations. Both the county and city have moratoriums in the construction of temporary lodging that will be in place until early August.

    In the meantime, elected officials and planning experts will work to enact meaningful land use codes designed to slow down the construction of overnight lodging while designating areas of Grand County suitable for affordable housing and commercial projects.

    The workshop is from 5 p.m. to 7 p.m. April 30 at the Grand Center, 182 North 500 West.

    Landmark has already hosted a pair of open houses and taken in feedback from scores of residents, but they need to hear from a wider representation of county residents, according to firm President Mark Vlasic and Zacharia Levine, the Grand County Community and Economic Development director.

    The open houses in late March were designed to get a sense of residents’ “current concerns and desires,” particularly relating to the moratorium on overnight accommodations, as well as their concerns about the future of Moab and Grand County, wrote a Landmark staffer in a summary of those comments.

    Much of what was said surprised nobody: Many residents believe tourism has grown far bigger than the region’s infrastructure can handle in terms ranging from traffic congestion and crowded stores and restaurants, to a lack of affordable housing for a workforce that keeps growing as more hotels, motels and other types of overnight accommodations are developed.

    A lack of parking, the levels of noise pollution, and “special event fatigue” also were mentioned as people would like to see the numbers reduced. The proposed reservation system for the sometimes crowded Arches National Park was lauded as one way to cut down on the number of tourists in town at a given time.

    Environmental concerns also were raised, especially regarding the already shaky water supply in the face of continued development. Dispersed camping and its toll on the environment were mentioned, as was the noise that comes with the increase of UTVs and other motorized off-road vehicles.

    Damage to air quality, light pollution, wildlife habitat and a need to instruct visitors on how to limit impacts were other hot topics.

    Local government was accused of not “exercising enough willpower” in denying certain development, or in enforcing current codes. “Up-zoning” happens much too frequently, they said.

    On the economic front, there appears to be a common perception that most money leaves Moab and goes to large corporations, which “don’t offer fair wages or support the local community … and are irreparably altering the physical character and sense of community” in the Moab area.

    The issue of housing was addressed, with support for higher densities voiced only if that density was used to house local residents. In a related matter, many endorsed waiving impact fees for affordable housing.

    Residents who have something to add to the conversation are strongly encouraged to attend the April 30 workshop as the clock is running on the moratorium. The goal for the county and city councils is to adopt future land use plans Landmark Design helps write in place before the moratorium ends Aug. 4.

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    County: No avoiding tax hike — even during a pandemic

    Were the property tax increase to be rescinded, he said Grand County “would literally be totally broke.”

    USFS proposes campground fee increases

    Members of the public are invited to comment on the proposed fee changes to the developed recreation program.

    Pine Gulch burns north of Grand Junction

    Bureau of Land Management spokesperson Maribeth Pecotte said the fire continued to grow in Sunday’s hot and dry conditions, which are expected to persist through the first half of the week.

    Zion rangers looking for vandals; squares painted on stone

    While most of the paint was removed, the area still has some paint remaining on the sandstone

    BLM lifts fire bans in Tres Rios, Uncompahgre field office areas

    “The BLM areas near the City of Durango are ‘Day Use Only,’ and overnight camping and campfires are prohibited to reduce fire risk."