Wednesday, July 15, 2020

SUBSCRIPTIONS

Moab, UT

82 F
Moab
More

    An open letter to the study committee

    Featured Stories

    Tales of Trails: Savor spectacular views from thrilling Shafer Trail

    In the 1890s, Moab pioneer brothers Frank M. And John S. Shafer developed the route from what had been a Native American pathway connecting what is now Canyonlands National Park to the river below.

    At 99, Moab man is knighted by France

    “The French people will never forget his courage and devotion to the great cause of freedom,”

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 4: ‘A year in the land of eternal spring’

    Though I planned to return someday, whether as a Peace Corps volunteer or not, this experience proved that even the best-laid plans go awry.

    Leaving Guatemala, Part 3: Sudden departure came with painful goodbyes

    Men donned wooden masks and numerous layers of sweatshirts and ponchos then proceeded to hit each other with whips as they danced around the town square.

    Leaving Guatemala Part 2: There wasn’t enough time to say goodbye

    To say I woke up on the Monday morning of the evacuation...
    Submitted
    Submitted
    Public submissions to The Times-Independent can range from press releases to obituaries to feature stories and news. All submissions are subject to editorial review and approval.

     Editor,

    In reviewing my file on the 1992 change in government, I was reminded that the campaign materials emphasized five fundamental elements: Seven-member council, five elected by district, nonpartisan elections, term limits and recall.  

    House Bill 224 eliminated the last three of those fundamental elements and you are now being encouraged to change the other two.  H.B. 224 was only adopted because of the outsized and secretive influence of a minority of Grand County citizens with the Utah Association of Counties and the Utah Legislature.  

    H.B. 224 reflects an elaborate and clever plan to secure a result, which that minority had not been able to attain when their proposals had to compete with the form of government adopted in 1992. Making the alternative the dreaded three-member at-large commission (a classic poison pill move) guaranteed your committee would be appointed and guarantees that whatever the study committee proposes will be adopted.  

    Do you believe the voters would have approved the creation of your committee if the alternative had been a continuation of our existing form, even with the H.B. 224 modifications (elimination of nonpartisan elections, term limits and recall, and change the name from council to commission)?

    Those behind H.B. 224 have already successfully removed Grand County voters’ rights to have nonpartisan elections, term limits and recall. Only a few Grand County voters had any say in those changes, since the process totally disrespected Grand County and its voters and gave no opportunity to our county council or anyone else to defend those elements of our current form of government. 

    Does it seem reasonable that the last remaining fundamental elements in our form of government now be changed by the study committee? How could you justify substituting your judgment for that reflected in the Grand County voters’ adoption of our present plan and voter rejection of alternatives every time they were proposed?  

    No number of public meetings can substitute for multiple elections. The only fair and democratic result is to limit the damage of H.B. 224 to Grand County by retaining the seven-member, five-elected-by-district structure in your proposal.

    Grand County voters have supported the seven-member, five-elected-by-district structure on multiple occasions. If those who now want to change that structure have the integrity to submit their alternative to the voters in an election that is an honest contest of ideas, they should do that.    

    Thanks for your consideration.  

    – Doug Fix
    Moab

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    County: Mask mandate is official

    Southeast Utah Health Department Director Bradon Bradford modeled the local order after those in Salt Lake and Summit counties.

    Lionsback Resort project begins on Sand Flats Road

    The City of Moab will have oversight of the project, which was not something that was always on the table because state law allows SITLA to develop projects without input from local authorities.

    Drought conditions grip Utah; stats are grim

    It’s unlikely things will improve this late in the water year.

    State provides 75,000 more facemasks for Moab businesses, visitors

    Local businesses may pick up free face coverings at the Canyonlands Copy Center, 375 S. Main St., in Moab.

    County approves letter opposing September gas lease sales

    The oppositional letter asserts that the lease sale “threatens the core of our tourism economy by locking in long-term oil and gas leases on and around popular recreation areas that are vital to our local economy.”