Sunday, May 31, 2020


Moab, UT

69.3 F

    Public note to study committee

    Featured Stories

    Leaving Guatemala

    I selected “send me where I’m needed most,” my desire to immerse myself in another country’s culture not affixed to any location in particular.

    Widespread testing is key to Moab’s path forward

    Once a person develops symptoms of COVID-19, it has likely already been days since they started unknowingly spreading the virus. As such, local health officials want to expand testing locally for the coronavirus.

    County to diversify post-virus

    The impacts of the pandemic have renewed local leaders’ focus on a topic many have worried over for years but must now confront in much starker terms: Economic diversification.

    Arches, Canyonlands to reopen May 29

    Arches and Canyonlands national parks will partially reopen to the public at the end of the month, according to a spokesperson for the parks, following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local public health authorities.

    The party is over at Imagination Station art supply store

    Cindy Sue Hunter serves a customer at her art supply store, Imagination Station, which has been reconfigured to allow shoppers to do what Hunter calls “door shopping."

    Where is broadband available in Moab?

    When the superintendent of Utah schools announced last month that school would...
    Public submissions to The Times-Independent can range from press releases to obituaries to feature stories and news. All submissions are subject to editorial review and approval.


    When my family and I moved to Moab in 1991, the city and county were experiencing serious problems because of the collapse of the uranium industry. You could buy a house for $18,000 to $28,000. There was a three-person county commission that was making decisions that many folks found problematic.

    In 1992, the citizens of Grand County voted to change their form of government. Over the next 25 years the voters were given several opportunities to change that form of government and always voted against any change.

    In 2018, unbeknownst to most county council members and the general public, an amendment making our form of government illegal was inserted into a bill that was not designed for such an amendment…causing a lot of confusion and resulting in a lawsuit that delayed the formation of the current voter-approved study committee by three months.

    I have attended every one of your meetings and can say for certain that I believe the folks who ended up on this committee turned out to be strong choices. While you very clearly come from the full political spectrum (as the law requires), you have been respectful to each other, honest, and diligent. And you came to the conclusions you did about the number of people, the form of government, and the type of districts based on input from county government employees, elected officials, the public, and hours of committee deliberation. You have been working on this for six months.

    Everyone in the community had an opportunity to weigh in, and while the four open houses were well attended, the weekly meetings of the study committee that were open to the public, were not. Other than reporters, I was often the only other citizen present.

    Having watched this process from the start, I want to thank you, but to also urge you to believe in the process and in your deliberations. You have made your decisions and have unanimously voted to recommend this Optional Plan to the voters of Grand County. It is now up to the county attorney to review and then for the county clerk to get it on the ballot.

    This has been a frustrating experience for many in this community. We were not given the option to keep what we had. If the Study Committee Optional Plan can be voted on in this coming November election (2019), then candidates for the new government would be elected in the general election of 2020. Waiting to put the optional plan on the ballot until 2020 would mean that the new county government would not take place until 2023.

    Grand County is not the same place it was in 1991. Those houses that sold for under $30,000 now sell for 10 times that amount. And the complexity of running this county has grown as well. We are not only a rural community with an extremely diverse population, but one that has become a national and international destination with over two and a half million visitors a year. This has created problems similar to those experienced by urban cities.

    Since HB224 forced Grand County to change its form of government, choosing the form best suited to deal with our complex issues and problems from the four approved forms were your only options. Thanks for what you have done and for how you have conducted this process. Let’s get it to the voters.

    – Carey Dabney
    registered voter, Grand County, Utah

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    City cuts jobs to bridge huge tax loss

    These steps are in addition to cuts made March 13 when 60 part-time employees were terminated.

    Youth spots fire, alerts authorities

    "They (firefighters) figured out where the fire was coming from … it started with a cigarette.”

    Broken bones in Left Hand

    All but one of the injuries involved jumping from rocks into a shallow pool at the base of a waterfall.

    Employment data confirms Grand is among worst hit in state

    The figures confirm earlier estimates that roughly one in five to one in six jobs in Grand County have been lost to COVID-19.

    Widespread testing is key to Moab’s path forward

    Once a person develops symptoms of COVID-19, it has likely already been days since they started unknowingly spreading the virus. As such, local health officials want to expand testing locally for the coronavirus.