Tuesday, June 2, 2020


Moab, UT

89.9 F

    TRT changes would provide little relief to Grand’s tourism impacts

    Featured Stories

    Leaving Guatemala

    I selected “send me where I’m needed most,” my desire to immerse myself in another country’s culture not affixed to any location in particular.

    Widespread testing is key to Moab’s path forward

    Once a person develops symptoms of COVID-19, it has likely already been days since they started unknowingly spreading the virus. As such, local health officials want to expand testing locally for the coronavirus.

    County to diversify post-virus

    The impacts of the pandemic have renewed local leaders’ focus on a topic many have worried over for years but must now confront in much starker terms: Economic diversification.

    Arches, Canyonlands to reopen May 29

    Arches and Canyonlands national parks will partially reopen to the public at the end of the month, according to a spokesperson for the parks, following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local public health authorities.

    The party is over at Imagination Station art supply store

    Cindy Sue Hunter serves a customer at her art supply store, Imagination Station, which has been reconfigured to allow shoppers to do what Hunter calls “door shopping."

    Where is broadband available in Moab?

    When the superintendent of Utah schools announced last month that school would...
    Carter Pape
    Carter Papehttp://moabtimes.awebstudio.com/author/carter-pape/
    Reporter Carter Pape covers news out of the Grand County Council Chambers, including housing, tourism, crime, and more.
    Tourists cross Main Street Friday evening, March 13. Photo by Doug McMurdo

    Moab’s representative in the Utah House of Representatives proposed a bill in February to reform provisions of the Transient Room Tax, a major funding source for Grand County’s and Moab’s public services, and it is nearing passage by Utah lawmakers with strong support from many officials in Salt Lake City and few in Moab.

    According to Grand County officials, the bill, if passed, would not do enough to support the spending the county must do to mitigate tourism impacts and makes public support of Grand’s tourism economy a “bad business plan,” creating more strain on public infrastructure than the tax can sustainably cover, leaving local residents to pick up the tab via property taxes.

    Although local officials closely criticize the bill in its current form, it has gained significant support from state lawmakers, enough to survive a veto by the governor, if that were to happen. The Utah House of Representatives recently passed the bill with 71 votes in favor and four abstentions. The Utah Senate’s latest — but not yet final — vote on the bill showed 26 out of 29 state senators were backing it. The remaining three abstained on the March 10 vote.

    H.B. 280 Transient Room Tax Provisions is sponsored by Grand County and southeastern Utah Rep. Carl Albrecht, R-Richfield, who Grand County Council members said is “firm” on the existing language in the bill after discussions regarding the bill with tourism industry lobbyists, the state’s fiscal analyst and other parties on the impacts the bill would have.

    Albrecht told The Times-Independent that Grand County would, if the bill passes, be getting “more than they had before” the bill was introduced with respect to how the county would like to be allowed to spend its share of TRT revenue. When asked why the bill had changed from its original form, Albrecht said that “the pie is only so big” and that competing interests in the bill had forced the compromise.

    “Can we tweak it in future years?” Albrecht asked rhetorically. “Maybe.”

    Among the changes the bill would have are that counties such as Grand would be freed up slightly on how it can spend its share of TRT revenue, explicitly allowing the county to spend lodging tax revenue on public airports, public transit and public parking. The bill would also allow cities — and Moab in particular — to continue making bond payments on debts made to cover tourism-related spending.

    Grand has already spent TRT funds on the Canyonlands Field Airport in recent years, to objections from state auditors who challenged the legality of the spending. The bill would clarify that small counties such as Grand are allowed to spend on publicly owned airports.

    Although the bill frees up the county to spend on more improvements than have been explicitly allowed in the past, county officials pointed to the changes that have been removed from the bill as the most striking.

    According to Grand County Clerk-Auditor Chris Baird, the bill does not do enough to help the county address growing costs that it already faces because of tourism. The county recently passed the largest property tax increase the area has ever seen, and it is the first time the property tax has increased since 2008. Baird said that happened because the county needed to cover the costs of tourism impacts.

    “I think a lot of that comes down to the fact that our promotion and the growth that we are experiencing in this community is creating expenses that are exceeding the revenue that is coming back in,” Baird said. “The way that I analogize the current TRT legislation is: It’s a bad business plan.”

    As it stands, 47% of the county’s share of local TRT revenue must be spent on promotion. The other 53% may be spent on mitigating the impacts of the tourism that the advertising attracts. The bill Albrecht proposed in February would have changed that split to allow 68% of TRT revenue to go toward tourism mitigation.

    After changes to the bill, that flexibility is no longer on the table.

    If the state senate passes the bill in its current form, the 53-47 split that currently governs counties’ TRT spending would remain. In its place, any growth in TRT revenue — that is, any additional lodging tax revenue a county collects above what it collected the previous year — would be split 37-63, with the larger share going toward mitigation.

    That change will have little to no impact on Grand’s budget woes, according to Baird, leaving the county “in the red.”

    “In order for the TRT legislation to have any really significant effect on our budget, it will take literally decades to happen because it’s going to be very, very slow, and so it’s not really a substantive change to the TRT legislation,” Baird said. “It’s not going to be a great help to Grand County.”

    The bill was scheduled on March 10 to go back before the Utah Senate for a third and final vote before then going to Gov. Gary Herbert to be signed into law or vetoed.

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    City cuts jobs to bridge huge tax loss

    These steps are in addition to cuts made March 13 when 60 part-time employees were terminated.

    Youth spots fire, alerts authorities

    "They (firefighters) figured out where the fire was coming from … it started with a cigarette.”

    Broken bones in Left Hand

    All but one of the injuries involved jumping from rocks into a shallow pool at the base of a waterfall.

    Employment data confirms Grand is among worst hit in state

    The figures confirm earlier estimates that roughly one in five to one in six jobs in Grand County have been lost to COVID-19.

    Widespread testing is key to Moab’s path forward

    Once a person develops symptoms of COVID-19, it has likely already been days since they started unknowingly spreading the virus. As such, local health officials want to expand testing locally for the coronavirus.