Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Moab, UT

75.1 F
Moab
More

    Kane County pulls out of plan for controversial Lake Powell pipeline

    Featured Stories

    Arches, Canyonlands to reopen May 29

    Arches and Canyonlands national parks will partially reopen to the public at the end of the month, according to a spokesperson for the parks, following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local public health authorities.

    The party is over at Imagination Station art supply store

    Cindy Sue Hunter serves a customer at her art supply store, Imagination Station, which has been reconfigured to allow shoppers to do what Hunter calls “door shopping."

    Lionsback Resort: City of Moab seeks help from Utah Supreme Court

    The City of Moab has appealed to the Utah Supreme Court a lower court’s finding that it should...
    Submitted
    Submitted
    Public submissions to The Times-Independent can range from press releases to obituaries to feature stories and news. All submissions are subject to editorial review and approval.

    Washington County is only recipient left

    For the last 10 years officials in southern Utah’s Kane County have been supportive of a plan that would pipe water to their area from the Colorado River to meet future needs. But the county’s water district suddenly announced April 16 that it was pulling out of the controversial — and costly — Lake Powell pipeline project.

    That leaves Washington County, home to the growing cities of St. George and Hurricane, the only recipient of the water, according to a story in the Salt Lake Tribune.

    The hotly debated project would divert 86,000 acre-feet of water a year from Lake Powell, which has faced steady declines in its levels, into a 143-mile pipeline ending in a reservoir near St. George. Along the way, the billion-dollar pipeline was to offload 4,000 acre-feet in Johnson Canyon east of Kanab.

    Kane County Water Conservancy District officials announced last week that they didn’t have a “foreseeable need” for the water after reviewing the county’s projected population growth and available water resources.

    The district’s general manager Mike Noel said, “We continue to support the Lake Powell pipeline and consider it absolutely essential to the future of southwestern Utah.” The Kanab resident is a retired Kanab state lawmaker who has long favored the project.

    Critics of the proposal say that Kane County has plenty of groundwater, and they argue on behalf of Utah taxpayers who would foot the multi-million-dollar project, tapping an over-allocated river. Zach Frankel, executive director of the Utah Rivers Council, said more than $25 million has been spent on environmental reviews already, with a new one underway by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, which is now in charge on a federal level in the wake of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission exiting that job.

    With Kane County withdrawing from the pipeline network, there won’t be a need to build a 10-mile pipe that would have directed the county’s share of the water to a place, ironically, less than a mile from Noel’s extensive ranch properties in Johnson Canyon.

    The project has shrunk substantially from its original version, first unveiled in 2006 legislation. The Tribune story noted that last year the Utah Division of Water Resources took away the hydroelectric generation components, which would have enlarged the project’s costs and environmental footprint. Nearby Iron County, home to Cedar City, had been another original participant, but it withdrew years ago because of the high cost of delivering the water all the way to its county seat.

    Many state officials argue that booming growth in and around St. George still creates a need for the pipeline, but some critics call it a boondoggle.

    Lake Powell could become a “dead pool” as climate change, political wars and unabated growth drain its waters. “Washington County is the fastest-growing and one of the driest regions in Utah,” said Todd Adams, director of the Utah Division of Water Resources. “The county is projected to triple in the next 40 years and is currently dependent on a single river basin that is almost fully developed. A second, reliable water source is vital for Washington County’s growing population and economy,” he said.

    The project’s timeline and process remain unaltered. The Bureau of Reclamation’s review is ongoing with a draft environmental impact statement anticipated for public comment planned for this summer.

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    Gas prices creep up as holiday dawns

    The national average price of gasoline has risen 2 cents per gallon in the last week, averaging $1.86 per gallon Monday.

    Nominees sought for Theodore Roosevelt Genius Prize Advisory Council

    It will focus on endangered species protection, invasive species management, poaching and wildlife trafficking prevention, and nonlethal solutions to human-wildlife conflicts, according to a press release from the department.

    School leaders say past months have taught ‘resilience,’ the power of relationships

    The Times-Independent interviewed Grand County High School Principal Steve Hren and Grand County School District Superintendent Taryn Kay on May 11 about their experience and thoughts about the two prior months, in which local campuses closed, and students were sent home to finish off their year doing distance education amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The class of 2020 will celebrate like none before

    With physical distancing and social togetherness the name of the game amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the class of 2020 from Grand County High School will join their peers around the state, country and world to celebrate their graduation in a manner that will be altogether unprecedented and unique but will — to the degree that it is safe — bring them together to celebrate on May 28.

    Grand County High School 2020 Senior Class

    The class of 2020, including a photo of some of the soon-to-be graduates from kindergarten.