Wednesday, May 27, 2020

Moab, UT

57.8 F

    County council: Community Rebuilds, Friends of Arches aren’t ‘community gifts’

    Nonprofits are denied property tax exemptions

    Featured Stories

    Arches, Canyonlands to reopen May 29

    Arches and Canyonlands national parks will partially reopen to the public at the end of the month, according to a spokesperson for the parks, following guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and state and local public health authorities.

    The party is over at Imagination Station art supply store

    Cindy Sue Hunter serves a customer at her art supply store, Imagination Station, which has been reconfigured to allow shoppers to do what Hunter calls “door shopping."

    Lionsback Resort: City of Moab seeks help from Utah Supreme Court

    The City of Moab has appealed to the Utah Supreme Court a lower court’s finding that it should...
    Carter Pape
    Carter Pape
    Reporter Carter Pape covers news out of the Grand County Council Chambers, including housing, tourism, crime, and more.
    Grand County Council Vice Chair Jaylyn Hawks recently voted to deny two requests by local nonprofits for property tax exemptions, saying one of them could be considered a “community burden,” as opposed to a “community benefit.” File photo by Doug McMurdo

    Two Grand County-based nonprofits that applied in February for property tax exemptions were recently denied their requests after officials made findings that the nonprofits did not provide a sufficient gift to the community, per Utah law, to qualify them for exemptions — exemptions that would have slightly raised property taxes on everyone else in the county.

    While state law calls for a variety of factors to contribute to the ultimate decision on whether a property owner may be exempt from paying local property taxes, the recent conclusions boiled down to two key points, having satisfied most of the other tests: Is the property providing a community benefit, and is it providing a community gift?

    Although the difference between “gift” and “benefit” might not be immediately obvious, the Utah Supreme Court does define the two terms differently in this context, and it was up to the Grand County Board of Equalization to decide whether applicants for property tax exemptions met both criteria.

    On this occasion, the Board of Equalization consisted of the same seven people who sit on the Grand County Council, who, as the county council, later voted to approve the board’s decision. Grand County Attorney Christina Sloan provided legal guidance to the board during their hearings with the two nonprofits.

    Friends of Arches and Canyonlands National Parks was the first nonprofit to request an exemption, and Community Rebuilds was the second. Each organization performs a variety of functions in Moab, but at question were the benefits provided by the specific properties for which they were seeking tax exemptions.

    Friends of Arches sought a property tax exemption on a nine-bedroom house wherein Arches or Canyonlands employees can stay, an alternative offered to the employees to keep them from having to do apartment-hunting around town when in-park housing fills up.

    While each property supports a nonprofit mission — in neither case do the owning organizations make financial gain from the properties — the bar for qualifying for an exemption is higher than merely turning no profit.

    According to a 1911 ruling by the Utah Supreme Court, cited by Grand County Christina Sloan in a document about the board’s decisions on the exemptions, a property may be exempt from taxation if “the state […] is presumed to receive benefits from the property equivalent at least to the public revenue that would otherwise be derived from it.”

    In answering the question of whether Friends of Arches satisfied this requirement, Jaylyn Hawks, a member of the equalization board and the county council, said that the nonprofit did not provide such a benefit.

    Is it a gift to the national parks? Definitely. Is it a gift to the occupants — the successful, lucky occupants that get to live there? Definitely. Is it a gift to the community? I’m going to have to say no and, in fact, it could be construed to be a burden.

    Jaylyn Hawks, Grand County Council

    Hawks continued by saying that the total dollar amount that Friends of Canyonlands would pay in property tax, spread evenly across other property tax payers, was not a “significant burden,” but pointed out that the list of existing property tax exemptions in Grand County is already hundreds long — now up to 378, she said — and that adding another to the list would be a “huge burden.”

    In addition to the “community benefit” requirement that council members ultimately found Friends of Arches did not satisfy, the property must also provide a “community gift,” which Sloan described as a “nonreciprocal contribution to the community” that alleviates a burden that would ordinarily fall onto the state or county to handle, such as public education, public safety, care for the impoverished or housing for those who are unable to provide it for themselves.

    This final distinction — who is receiving the housing and whether they could provide it for themselves — proved to be key to the board’s decision on the tax exemptions sought by Community Rebuilds.

    Precedent in Utah is that housing does not constitute a burden on the state if the housing is for able-bodied, working-age adults, according to case law cited by Sloan. However, the equalization board collectively found that, although Community Rebuilds provides a community benefit, the service that the property provides — the focus for the county in this case was the housing the properties provide for interns and volunteers — is not one that courts have held to be a public burden.

    “Here, the recipients of the charity (meaning, the use of the properties) is restricted to interns of Community Rebuilds, the Southeast Utah Health Department, and the Youth Garden Project, none of which are offered housing based on need,” read the conclusions approved by the county council.

    The decisions on the tax exemptions were not unanimous. Not present for the proceedings was Rory Paxman, and abstaining from the vote on the Community Rebuilds matter was Gabriel Woytek, who works for Youth Garden Project, a close partner of the nonprofit.

    Evan Clapper and Mary McGann had both argued for Community Rebuilds providing a community gift to Grand County, and McGann made that argument as well for Friends of Arches. Ultimately, votes by Jaylyn Hawks, Greg Halliday and Curtis Wells led to both nonprofits being denied property tax exemptions.

    Share this!

    - Advertisement -

    Latest News

    Gas prices creep up as holiday dawns

    The national average price of gasoline has risen 2 cents per gallon in the last week, averaging $1.86 per gallon Monday.

    Nominees sought for Theodore Roosevelt Genius Prize Advisory Council

    It will focus on endangered species protection, invasive species management, poaching and wildlife trafficking prevention, and nonlethal solutions to human-wildlife conflicts, according to a press release from the department.

    School leaders say past months have taught ‘resilience,’ the power of relationships

    The Times-Independent interviewed Grand County High School Principal Steve Hren and Grand County School District Superintendent Taryn Kay on May 11 about their experience and thoughts about the two prior months, in which local campuses closed, and students were sent home to finish off their year doing distance education amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

    The class of 2020 will celebrate like none before

    With physical distancing and social togetherness the name of the game amid the COVID-19 pandemic, the class of 2020 from Grand County High School will join their peers around the state, country and world to celebrate their graduation in a manner that will be altogether unprecedented and unique but will — to the degree that it is safe — bring them together to celebrate on May 28.

    Grand County High School 2020 Senior Class

    The class of 2020, including a photo of some of the soon-to-be graduates from kindergarten.